“Allen v. Farrow” dismisses as misogynistic gaslighting Allen’s claim that the abuse charge stemmed from longtime partner Mia Farrow’s anger at his affair with her adopted daughter Soon-Yi Previn (now Allen’s wife). Yet it erases evidence supporting this claim — such as Farrow’s behavior shortly before the alleged Aug. 4, 1992, sexual assault. In mid-July, when Allen visited Farrow’s Connecticut house for Dylan’s seventh birthday, Farrow put up a note calling him a “child molester” who had “abused” Soon-Yi and was after Dylan. In an Aug. 1 call to Dr. Susan Coates, the psychologist working with the couple’s children (who later testified at the custody trial), Mia Farrow denounced Allen as “satanic” and “evil” and begged her to “find a way to stop him.”

Ronan Farrow was walking around (again *before* the alleged incident saying, “my daddy fucked my sister.” Mia was enraged about Soon-Yi.

That is messed up. She can be mad at Allen (rightfully so) but not drag a four and seven-year-old into her drama.

It’s horrible that someone’s name and reputation are ruined by false allegations when two legal bodies have cleared him.

Also, another employee of Mia’s, Sandy Boluch, testified she saw Dylan crying and when she asked her what was wrong, she replied, “Mommy wants me to lie.”